Expressive Arts Therapy: Outside Client Report

(Fall, 1998)

Session 3

In our final session, we went back specifically to the relationship with the father, and spent some time discussing what he wanted to do about it. Jim mentioned specifically that he wanted to have some sort of conversation with his father where he laid everything on the table, telling him how he felt abandoned, unloved, unwanted, neglected, etc., and to get some sort of response from his father, even a negative one.

I asked him if he felt he was ready to do this, and while he thought he was at first, we delved into the issue of why he hadn't so far, and we both realized that had he been ready, the conversation would have already taken place. So we started talking about the possible consequences and the fears involved in having such a discussion.

I guided him through another meditation in which I asked him to think about having the conversation with his father, and to see if a particular part of his body was serving as some sort of blocking force and to focus in on that part of its body and see if it had anything to say to him.

As fate would have it, it had a lot to say to him.

the chokehold He drew an image which looked like a fist holding a bag of fire, surrounded by smoke. But when I started to ask him about it, it wasn't a bag of fire. It was a belly full of anger. And the fist wasn't holding it up. It was blocking it from release. We discovered that whenever he gets angry, he feels a tightening around his throat when he's getting ready to express that anger.

So we talked about this for awhile, and I reiterated something I'd mentioned in prior sessions which was that it's impossible for us to guarantee anything about how his father will react to the conversation, or to make a therapeutic goal to receive something from somebody else. The only thing I can focus on is the client in the room at the time. So we decided to spend the final session focusing on his relationship with his father, but specifically in terms of what he could do, regardless of his father's reactions.

The chokehold was a perfect opportunity for this. I had assumed that the hand represented his father but upon questioning, I discovered that, in fact, it represented himself. He was able to totally own the issue at hand, knowing that he blocked himself, and that he had to take responsibility for that.

We then discussed what he might wish to do to change or transform the image. After some more processing, he decided that he didn't want to completely give up the holding in of anger. He said that sometimes the ability to hold back can be helpful and useful to him. However, he didn't like the sense of it being a chokehold. I asked him if he wanted to transform the image and this time he sketched over the current image, making the hand a little bit more open (it was previously a closed fist) and releasing some small amount of the fire into the area outside the belly.

This seemed to settle well with him-- using his own grip on his throat as a release valve as opposed to continuing the extreme of holding in all the anger, or going to the other extreme of choosing an instantaneous release of letting it all out at once.

We then spent some time processing all four of the images he'd created, as a way of closing the sessions. One thing I noticed is that hands were featured in every one of his drawings.

I asked him if this had any specific significance for him, and he wasn't sure, but we did spend a little time probing that. In every image he was either reaching out for something (his father or other older men), or holding onto something (his brother, his anger). I didn't press him further on this but told him he might want to ask himself about it later and see if anything comes to him.
Holism main page | Session 2 | What I've Learned